Altering signature to halt payment like lack of funds

0
1215
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

The Supreme Court of India in a recent judgment has extended the ambit of section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, to dishonour of cheques due to mismatch of the drawer’s signature on the cheque with the specimen signature held by the bank.

In M/s Laxmi Dyechem v State of Gujarat & Ors, one of the respondents issued several cheques signed by its authorized signatory in favour of the complainant. Several of the cheques were dishonoured by the bank on the ground that the signatures on the cheques were incomplete or did not match the specimen signatures held by the bank. The cheques remained unpaid despite notice being served on the respondents under section 138 of the act.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

The update of court judgments is compiled by Bhasin & Co, Advocates, a corporate law firm based in New Delhi. The authors can be contacted at lbhasin@bhasinco.in or lbhasin@gmail.com. Readers should not act on the basis of this information without seeking professional legal advice.

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link