China’s antitrust probes into industrial giants have been widely reported, but what are the implications for other market players? Joanna Law explores the key risks

The anti-monopoly regulations and their enforcement are evolving in China, becoming more concrete and transparent. In the meantime, legal practitioners expect there will be more tightening of enforcement as the country actively probes into various influential market players. Moving forward, there will likely be more changes, enforcement activity, regulation and investigations to come.

“China’s Anti-Monopoly Law [AML] came into force on 1 August 2008. At the beginning, both antitrust public enforcement and private actions were not very active. But today there have been great changes in this respect,” says Deng Zhisong, a Beijing-based partner at Dacheng Law Offices.

We’re watching you-Jiang Liyong

Jiang Liyong, a Beijing-based senior partner at Gaopeng & Partners, agrees. “Antitrust enforcement now covers a broader range of areas. Anti-administrative monopoly investigations have also emerged,” he says. “Investigations into foreign enterprises have caught much attention, and the fines in those cases kept reaching new record highs. But domestic companies, including large state-owned enterprises, are also on the radar of antitrust investigation.”

You must be a subscriber to read this content, or you can register for free to enjoy the current issue.

该部分内容仅提供予《商法》订阅会员。你可以订阅去解锁所有内容。你也可以免费注册去浏览最新一期的内容。

Practitioner’s perspectives
Huang Wei, Tian Yuan Law Firm in Beijing PP
A brief introduction to NDRC’s antitrust guidelines on IP misuse
Huang Wei, Tian Yuan Law Firm
Jet Deng Zhisong and Ken Dai Jianmin Dacheng Law Offices PP
MOFCOM probes and punishment for unfiled business concentrations
Jet Deng Zhisong and Ken Dai Jianmin, Dacheng Law Offices