Appeal tribunal lacks power to allow filing delay

0
1419
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

Delhi High Court recently considered whether the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) has jurisdiction to condone a delay, under section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, in the filing of an appeal under section 18 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (SARFAESI Act). In Poonam Garg v The Chief Manager, State Bank Of Patiala & Anr, Garg filed an application under section 17 of the SARFAESI Act before the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Chandigarh, which was dismissed in default. Garg’s application for recall of the DRT order was also dismissed due to non-appearance. Another application filed for restoration was dismissed on the ground that Garg had not indicated sufficient cause for non-appearance.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

The dispute digest is compiled by Bhasin & Co, Advocates, a corporate law firm based in New Delhi. The authors can be contacted at lbhasin@bhasinco.in or lbhasin@gmail.com. Readers should not act on the basis of this information without seeking professional legal advice.

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link