Court’s role in insolvency cases

0
2917
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

Subodh Sadana and Bhuvan Arora analyse judicial intervention in insolvency resolution

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) has so far travelled a short journey of about 18 months where it has already faced a plethora of legal challenges. In order to overcome these challenges, parties have resorted to judicial intervention leading to resolution of several of these challenges, while the legal battle in some of the matters is still sub judice.

Subodh Sadana
Subodh Sadana

One must appreciate that the tribunals and the Supreme Court have been quite proactive in resolving and settling most of the issues. Certain issues have travelled from the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) and ultimately have been settled by the Supreme Court. The issue of “dispute” was settled by the Supreme Court in Mobilox Innovations Private Limited v Kirusa Software Private Limited where it was held that there should be a pre-existing dispute, i.e. it should exist before the issuance of a demand notice by the operational creditor and a mere illusory dispute raised for the first time while replying to a demand notice cannot act as a barrier for admitting the application under the IBC.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

Advaita-LegalAdvocates SUBODH SADANA and BHUVAN ARORA are insolvency experts at Advaita Legal.

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link