In April, the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) issued a draft judicial interpretation entitled Provisions on Several Issues of Application of Laws in the Trial of Disputes in Relation to Infringement of the Right of Communication through Information Networks. The SPC addresses rampant online infringement with rules drawn from judicial practice of the PRC courts, as well as foreign experience.
The key provisions of the draft interpretation are:
- party is a “content provider” and directly infringes copyright if it uploads copyright-protected works so the public can access them by downloading or web-browsing;
- the copyright owner is responsible for providing prima facie evidence that the defendant is responsible for providing infringing material, but a defendant will not be deemed a “content provider” if it can show that it only provides online services;
You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章，欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
Business Law Digest is compiled with the assistance of Baker & McKenzie. Readers should not act on this information without seeking professional legal advice. You can contact Zhang Danian (Shanghai) at Baker & McKenzie by e-mail at: danian.zhang@bakermckenzie.com
