Malaysian push to reveal beneficial ownership

0
2228
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

As part of a revamp of the Malaysian Companies Act 2016 (MCA), a new provision granting the power to a company to enquire into the beneficial owner of the shares in a company was inserted. This is supplemented by the power granted to the Companies Commission of Malaysia (CCM), Bursa Malaysia Securities (the stock exchange) and the Securities Commission of Malaysia to direct that a company makes such an enquiry.

The CCM had, on 8 November 2019, issued an exposure draft of the Guidelines for the Reporting Framework for the Beneficial Ownership of Legal Persons. The exposure draft provides guidance on the companies that will be required to make enquiries on beneficial owners (BOs), the requisite information for completing the register of beneficial ownership, and the documents required to be maintained as evidence of steps taken to verify the BOs.

Companies should be aware of their obligation to maintain and submit BO information together with annual returns. There is also a requirement to notify the CCM within 14 days of any change to BO information.

While the exposure draft is still in draft form, the salient provisions proposed under the guidelines are set out below.

(1) Requirement to obtain BO information applies to all companies, with certain exemptions. The reporting framework proposed by the exposure draft applies to all companies incorporated in Malaysia and foreign companies registered under the MCA. Financial institutions, public listed companies and companies with shares deposited in the central depository are exempted from the proposed reporting framework.

(2) Reasonable measures to identify BO information. Companies are required to take reasonable measures to identify their BOs. These include:

(a) Reviewing all documents and information available at the company level (e.g., register of members, shareholders agreement, constitution, etc.);

(b) Analyzing the interests in the company held by individuals, corporate entities and/or trusts;

(c) Obtaining BO information by sending out notices pursuant to section 56 of the MCA (section 56 notice) at least once annually; and

(d) Maintaining a BO register, and ensuring that the information is up to date, accurate and accessible in a timely manner.

The BO register must contain information such as the type of beneficial ownership, beneficial ownership percentages, and, whenever the BO information is received pursuant to a section 56 notice, the date of the section 56 notice / BO information was received.

Where the company has reasonable cause to believe it has a BO but is unable to identify that individual, even after taking reasonable steps, the BO register must reflect this.

(3) BO information must include information on the “ultimate owner of the shares”. In order for companies to discharge their obligation of identifying BOs, the exposure draft has provided further guidance to the definition.

Under the MCA, a beneficial owner is “the ultimate owner of the shares, and does not include a nominee of any description”. The term “ultimate owner of the shares” is in turn defined under the exposure draft to be an individual (natural person) who meets any of the following criteria:

(a) The individual has interest, directly or indirectly, in at least 20% of the shares in the company;

(b) The individual holds, directly or indirectly, at least 20% of the voting shares of the company;

(c) The individual has the right to exercise significant influence or dominant control over the company, its directors, or the management of the company;

(d) The individual has the power to directly or indirectly appoint or remove a director who holds a majority of the voting rights at meetings of the board of directors of a company; or

(e) The individual is a shareholder and, under an agreement with another shareholder of the company, controls alone a majority of the voting right in the company.

(4) Government-linked companies. A company owned or controlled by the government of Malaysia is, by that fact alone, not exempted. The government will be required to submit and declare beneficial ownership of companies. This is notwithstanding the fact that the relevant office may not necessarily be the ultimate owner of the shares of the company.

Conclusion

Once the exposure draft is finalized and adopted as law, it will become a legal requirement. Companies that do not adhere to the requirements under the exposure draft may be liable to administrative sanctions or penalties. Similarly, BOs who fail to respond to a section 56 notice, or provide false information, commit an offence under the MCA.

The new requirement will result in greater discipline by both companies and their shareholders in making disclosures on the beneficial ownership of companies. As the exposure draft also addresses disclosures in respect of trust arrangements, there may be a need for settlors to revisit their arrangements to understand and appreciate the level of disclosure.

The exposure draft is likely to be finalized and come into force early next year, probably prior to the mutual evaluation of Malaysia by the Financial Action Task Force on anti-money laundering and combating of financial terrorism.

Business Law Digest is compiled with the assistance of Baker McKenzie. Readers should not act on this information without seeking professional legal advice. You can contact Baker McKenzie by emailing Danian Zhang at danian.zhang@bakermckenzie.com.

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link