Ruling in Champagne Moet And Chandon v Union of India & Ors, Delhi High Court recently upheld a decision taken in 2004 by the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) to not interfere with an order by the Deputy Registrar of Trademarks (DR) to allow the registration of the mark MOET’S.
The French champagne company Moët & Chandon had objected to the registration as it has held the Indian trademark registrations for MOET and MOET & CHANDON (in class 33 of the Trade and Merchandise Marks Act, 1958) from 1982 and 1985 respectively.
Origins of the dispute
A Delhi-based seller of meat products, M/s Moet’s, had applied in 1986 for the registration of the mark MOET’S.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章，欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
Manisha Singh Nair is a partner at Lex Orbis IP, a New Delhi-based intellectual property practice.
709/710 Tolstoy House, 15-17 Tolstoy Marg
New Delhi – 110 001
India
Tel: +91 11 2371 6565
Fax: +91 11 2371 6556
Email: mail@lexorbis.com
