LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

As institutional arbitration takes root in India, how should companies select the best forum for resolving their disputes?

In 2005 the Supreme Court of India’s constitutional bench handed down 17 judgments. Eight dealt with specific articles of the constitution, and the rest were on subjects ranging from corporate criminal liability to the fallout of nationalizing a bus route in rural Andhra Pradesh.

However, one judgment – SBP & Co v Patel Engineering Ltd – required the seven judges who delivered it to consider their own powers. The question before them was: is the power given to the chief justice to appoint an arbitrator in section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, judicial or administrative?

A niggling doubt

India’s judiciary had considered this seemingly innocuous question several times since 1999. Their decision in this case would be key to how much control the courts have over arbitral proceedings that appear on their radar.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们


LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link