The Supreme Court of India, in its recent judgment in IDBI Trusteeship Services Ltd v Hubtown Ltd, has reviewed the principles governing the grant of “leave to defend” in a summary suit as per the amended order XXXVII rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.The case involved a summary suit filed by IDBI against Hubtown for a guarantee issued in favour of IDBI.
The judgment sets aside the finding of Bombay High Court, which allowed unconditional leave to defend to Hubtown in view of “triable issues which require adjudication on further evidence”.
While scrutinizing the defence raised by Hubtown, the Supreme Court considered whether the guidelines set out in Mechelec Engineers & Manufacturers v M/s Basic Equipment Corporation (1976) stood superseded in view of the amendment to order XXXVII in 1976, and considered the provisions of the order as it stood prior to the amendment and as it now stands.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
Vivek Vashi is the mainstay of the litigation team at Bharucha & Partners, where Aishwarya Singh is an associate.
Cecil Court, 4th Floor
MK Bhushan Road
Mumbai – 400 039
India
Contact details:
Tel: +91 22 2289 9300
Fax: +91 22 2282 3900
Email: sr.partner@bharucha.in