Winding-up petition rejected as debt recovery tool

0
1533
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

In IBA Health (India) Private Limited v Info-Drive Systems, the Supreme Court said “it is well-settled that a winding-up petition is not a legitimate means of seeking to enforce payment of the debt which is bona fide disputed by the company. A petition presented ostensibly for a winding-up order but really to exercise pressure will be dismissed, and under circumstances may be stigmatized as a scandalous abuse of the process of the court.”

In this case Info-Drive petitioned Karnataka High Court to wind up IBA Health, under sections 433(e) and (f), 434 and 439 of the Companies Act, 1956, on the ground that IBA Health owed it US$1,065,714.

Admitting the winding-up petition, the judge ordered that the case should be relisted for the court to decide about advertising the matter in a newspaper.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

The update of court judgments is compiled by Bhasin & Co, Advocates, a corporate law firm based in New Delhi. The authors can be contacted at lbhasin@bhasinco.in or lbhasin@gmail.com. Readers should not act on the basis of this information without seeking professional legal advice.

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link